© the copyright holder. Photo credit: Gallery Oldham
This sculpture appears to have been made from wood, but which kind? It looks like a highly figured and rather exotic burl that has been polished, then retouched using a stain. The effect is reptilian.
Could anyone suggest who might have sculpted it, or where it might have come from and when?
This folk art piece made from a burled knot of maple, c.1960, is similar.
This looks to me as if it is built up from clay. See the attached image for the technique. The difference and variations in texture in the neck, face and hair are explained by this. Doesn't look at all like wood to me. It should be easy to tell by tapping it with a fingernail. Date probaby 1920s or '30s?
I agree that it is most likely made of clay. My husband sculpts and thinks that perhaps rolls of clay were pressed into the basic form to get that burled effect. Sometimes he has fired a piece then used shoe polish to get a wooden effect. Photo attached
Thank you for these suggestions that this is probably made of clay, rather than wood.
Pat, thank you for the attachments. Your husband's wooden effect from firing followed by shoe polish is very convincing!
This is a modelled, not a carved piece, although it is not clear whether it is a cast after a clay model. What the sculptor was hoping to achieve in the initial modelling of this bust, was surface texture. The 'pelleted' effect was used by sculptors such as Frank Dobson (1886-1963), occasionally Jacob Epstein when he turned to modelling after WWII, Peter Peri (1899-1967), and others.
Dobson theorised on 'form', achieved by 'rolled up mud', which he argued came, in the grand scheme of things, before 'scratches' on cave walls. The rather anonymous bust under discussion has classical 'blind' eyeballs, not characteristic of Dobson, but common to the 1920s and 30s, and more typical of most of the busts by Dora Gordine (1895-1991), whose work also shows a fascination with surface texture.
I am not suggesting the bust under discussion is by any of the sculptors mentioned, only that the techniques are common to modellers in clay in the second quarter of the twentieth century. The helmeted hairstyle might corroborate Andrew's suggestion as to date.
It would appear that the finished fired or cast surface has been 'patinated' with soot, or pigment, or even as Pat suggests boot black.
Perhaps Gallery Oldham could check the medium, as Andrew says this should not be difficult. What does it weigh? Can you pick it up? Is it fired clay, in other words terracotta (most likely), or is it plaster or a resin substitute, painted and patinated?
Again provenance would help, it has only a temporary accession number.
I am the Collections Assistant, Art for Gallery Oldham. I have had a look at the head in order to ascertain the material of the sculpture and it appears to be a cast metal which is hollow.
I have double checked what information we have on the head and unfortunately the provenance is not know at this moment in time in order to shed any further light on it.
Many thanks for looking into this-and for pointing us to the right direction in regards to the bust’s material.
It’s quite helpful that we can now ascertain that’s bust is made from metal -rather than wood or clay.
Does anyone following this discussion would have any new suggestions on artist and/or date?
I expect the date is probably 1920s-1930s.
I would like to thank Dr Jonathan Black FRSA, FRHistS, Senior Research Fellow in History of Art at Kingston School of Art, for his comments on this piece. In his opinion this does not look like the work of Dora Gordine, but he suggests we could look at one of her inter-war contemporaries such as Dora Clarke, Gertrude Hermes or Karin Jonzen. He adds that Dobson generally produced a much smoother surface finish and the treatment here suggests to him an awareness of Epstein post-First World War. Does anyone have access to Benedict Read and Peyton Skipwith, 'Sculpture in Britain between the Wars' (Fine Art Society: London, 1986)?