Portraits: British 18th C 7 comments Is this portrait of Rowland Holt by Francis Alleyne or Henry Walton?
Photo credit: West Suffolk Heritage Service
I think that this portrait of Rowland Holt is by Francis Alleyne, not Henry Walton. I have bought/sold several very similar portraits by Francis Alleyne – his work is distinctive. A quick internet search will bring up comparable images. Here is one from the National Portrait Gallery and another from the website of the dealer Roy Precious.
https://bit.ly/2OW9Z7C
https://bit.ly/2NDjRXx
The collection comments: ‘We welcome with interest the suggestion that the portrait of Rowland Holt was painted by Francis Alleyne rather than Henry Walton. We will annotate our records accordingly with this possibility. This particular portrait has been part of our collections for a long time and has previously been viewed and valued by both Phillips and Christie’s who were happy to value it on the basis that it was by Henry Walton. We will mention the possibility of an alternative artist when it next comes up for assessing. Any other views, raised by starting a public discussion on this subject, would be welcomed. Particularly if sources for the information could be provided, that way we can add these to our records.’
7 comments
I agree with the attribution to Henry Walton. There are several characteristics that I find typical of Walton. The immediacy, the direct gaze, the handling of the paint.
This face is particularly like the face in the portrait of Henry Walton's sister, Elizabeth Bridgman. An enlargement of this portrait is available on Wikimedia Commons.
Alleyne's paintings, on the other hand, seem to have a gentler quality and are a little unsure in the anatomy.
Are there any comparable examples of Alleyne's work?
Many of Alleyne's portraits depict his sitters seated. Furthermore, Alleyne often includes part of the seat furniture in his portraits. I don't believe Walton generally does that. These examples all strike me as very close to the Holt picture in conception and style
Of the two attributions suggested, Francis Alleyne or Henry Walton, I think that Alleyne is more likely for the reasons given by Miles. The portrait is very different to Walton as I know him and I don't think the comparisons above stand up to scrutiny. Walton's colouring, his formats and his face structures are unlike our portrait.
I’ve attached a composite based on another portrait of Rowland Holt on Art UK (by John Downman, at Gunby Hall). Holt certainly looks much older in the Downman portrait than in the work that is being discussed.
https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/rowland-holt-of-redgrave-suffolk-171424
Here is another link to the portrait by Downman.
https://www.nationaltrustcollections.org.uk/object/637625
***
The attached snippet from 'British and Irish Paintings in Public Collections' (2006) by Christopher Wright and Catherine May Gordon shows that the title of this work used to be 'Rowland Holt of Redgrave Hall'.
The current title could be improved.
***
Here are portraits of two members of the Holt family of Redgrave – likely two of Rowland Holt’s siblings:
https://tinyurl.com/z78t2rxb
https://tinyurl.com/mr29j5p3
Wikipedia shows that Rowland Holt's dates were 1723-1786.
https://tinyurl.com/5c93mxsd
His burial record on Ancestry also includes those dates.
An extract from an article in the 'Newmarket Journal' of the 21st of September 1935 mentions the acquisition of this painting. It was donated by the three sisters of Prince Frederick Duleep Singh (1868-1926).
https://tinyurl.com/25y83tns
Could the artist be John Trumbell (1756–1843)? He was an American artist who worked in London and who studied under Benjamin West.
Please take a look at this painting at the White House 'Thomas Jefferson' (1788). The text indicates that Trumbell had first painted the image as part of another work and he copied it for this one.
https://www.whitehousehistory.org/photos/thomas-jefferson-by-john-trumbull
See also, https://smarthistory.org/trumbull-declaration/
I'll look in the NPG archive next week if I can. I think we are moving towards closure with an attribution to Francis Alleyne. But I'd like to strengthen the evidence.
Alleyne's life and work are so little known that it is worth summarising Ellis Waterhouse's summary biography in his Dictionary of British 18th century painters: Active as a portrait painter between 1774 and 1790, usually on a small scale. Exhibited a single portrait at the Royal Academy and the Free Society of Artists in 1774 and at the Society of Artists in 1790. Seems to have specialized in small oval ¾ lengths usually signed on the back. Probably moved around Kent in 1786, going from family to family to paint portraits.
Our portrait is indeed oval and is painted at Alleyne's favoured size of about 36 or 37 by 29 or 30 cms.